Since the US government is so inept and stupid. Because the defense department are such idiots and cowards. Because our military commanders are such fags, girls and ass kissers, I will give them some simple advice on how to protect against terror, how to win a war and how to prevent tons of soldiers from taking their own lives.
1. Most problems that the Military and government have are easy to fix. Most can be fixed by taking current practices and reverse them - doing things opposite of how they are being done now. FIRE PEOPLE IN CHARGE WHEN THEY FUCK UP AND THE "SYSTEM FAILS." and "DON'T COURT MARTIAL YOUR OWN GOD DAMN SOLDIERS FOR DOING THEIR JOB."
2. Don't be a liar and coward. If you take on a fight, then fight. This means to burn your fucking rules of engagement and let soldiers kill in the most devasting and effective way possible. If a commandor or general wants to be a politician or a pussy then let him go run for congress or become a hair stylist. Don't promote pussy, political pencil pushing slip-dick cowards and ass kissers into command positions. Hello - it's an army you dip shits. If you are not comfy dealing with military stuff - which involves killing - then go work in some public relations department. This instead of trying to make the military a god damn ballerina squad because you are a pussy and ass kiss and coward and are uncomfortable with the nature of the military. Let the soldiers do their work to their full ability. This way, they will succeed and feel proud .. and the country will be safe.
3. It is incredible how stupid the current leaders of our country and military are. Any that insist to being non-stupid, are then claiming to be enemies of America. Because nobody other than an enemy would invoke such policies, govern and command in such a way, if they had 1/2 a brain and any desire to do good for the country.
Friday, April 16, 2010
Thursday, March 18, 2010
A few days before the trojan horse and still nobody gets it
I've been posting for about a year now about what the Health Care Bill is really about. Amnesty. Amnesty, what else could it be? We know Pelosi and Obama couldn't care less if you and I drop dead or get good health care. Also, the Democrats have hardly mentioned amnesty since Obama took office. Why in the world would one of their biggest issues just vanish? Is it logical that the Democrats would be so much more, extremely, passionate about health care reform than about amnesty? They wouldn't be. I don't know exactly how they have rigged it legally, but I strongly suspect their health care is all and only about amnesty. This is the only answer that can explain the behavior we see. The forging ahead at all cost, the frantic grab at an issue we know they couldn't care THAT desperately about... seeming to risk their political futures.... it's Amnesty - it has to be.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Obama's Inheritence from Bush Has Been Spent So Please Stop Your Withdrawals.
To those of us who work, (actually work - as apposed to gov. job), know when it was good and when it went bad. The company I was with when Obama took office, had just had a record year whith more than doubling the previous year's profit. We were expanding, hiring, planning, upgrading and growing.
By the time Obama had served 6 months as president, my company had let go 1/2 of it's 500 employees. My position was one of the casualties of a steep decline of business that coincided with Obama's inauguration almost to the week.
This company was America. Privately owned and growing, we manufactured stuff and provided services, We were the source of income for 500 Americans and actively hiring.
This explains why I am so offended by liberals who continue to assert and support the notion that today's problems are inherited from Bush: first of all, it is dishonest to blame the worsening economy on Bush - and every person involved in real, private, American business knows it. Secondly, this dishonesty is providing an ongoing excuse for the current idiot-in-chief to use as an alternative to fixing the problems - removes the necessity for Obama to do better.
The brass tax of it all is this: Democrats are so selfish and disgusting, that even during crisis when the Country doesn't need any bullshit, the Democrats protect their win and their point at the expense of the country's well being. These scoundrel Democrats would sooner lose their country than lose an argument
So to you Democrats, I say: Obama has already, for the time being at least, wrecked business for Americans. We know this, so don't waste your lies and excuses for Obama on us. Honor and good character would suggest that you democrats get honest and face reality - - be mature adults and deal with the fact that Obama is not what your hearts wanted him to be; and, no amount of fantasy is going to morph such an abysmal, feckless president into any sort of solution creator or catalyst of hope. If you democrats joined the side of truth, at least the pressure and responsibility would shift to where it belongs and can do the most good: if Obama was to ever resurrect any hope, it would only happen after the excuses stopped and he was held accountable for his performance. Unfortunately, honor and good character aren't very useful to the Democrat, so I am certain their lies will continue to provide a road of excuses for Obama as he drives America into the ground.
By the time Obama had served 6 months as president, my company had let go 1/2 of it's 500 employees. My position was one of the casualties of a steep decline of business that coincided with Obama's inauguration almost to the week.
This company was America. Privately owned and growing, we manufactured stuff and provided services, We were the source of income for 500 Americans and actively hiring.
This explains why I am so offended by liberals who continue to assert and support the notion that today's problems are inherited from Bush: first of all, it is dishonest to blame the worsening economy on Bush - and every person involved in real, private, American business knows it. Secondly, this dishonesty is providing an ongoing excuse for the current idiot-in-chief to use as an alternative to fixing the problems - removes the necessity for Obama to do better.
The brass tax of it all is this: Democrats are so selfish and disgusting, that even during crisis when the Country doesn't need any bullshit, the Democrats protect their win and their point at the expense of the country's well being. These scoundrel Democrats would sooner lose their country than lose an argument
So to you Democrats, I say: Obama has already, for the time being at least, wrecked business for Americans. We know this, so don't waste your lies and excuses for Obama on us. Honor and good character would suggest that you democrats get honest and face reality - - be mature adults and deal with the fact that Obama is not what your hearts wanted him to be; and, no amount of fantasy is going to morph such an abysmal, feckless president into any sort of solution creator or catalyst of hope. If you democrats joined the side of truth, at least the pressure and responsibility would shift to where it belongs and can do the most good: if Obama was to ever resurrect any hope, it would only happen after the excuses stopped and he was held accountable for his performance. Unfortunately, honor and good character aren't very useful to the Democrat, so I am certain their lies will continue to provide a road of excuses for Obama as he drives America into the ground.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Why such a division of opinion about Obama: here's the answer
I find it curious how one group of Americans have a positive view of President Obama while another regards him to be a horrible president and bad for the country. What could possibly explain how presumably decent and rational people can have such a different perspective?
I think this divide can be explained by a difference in perspective. Going from left to right, what sort of perspective could explain the positive opinions that many on the left seem to have towards Obama. I can only see Obama as a good thing if I think about him and his actions as being in a vacuum and take America out of the scenario. Now I can look at spending money on social reforms as a pretty humanitarian act. Likewise, reforming health care so that everybody can have it, sounds pretty compassionate too. Even the way that Obama bows to foreign leaders almost seems to have a bit of charm in it's humility. This perspective requires that the focus be limited to Obama.
Obama critics are not judging Obama in a vacuum. They are viewing Obama in the context of America. He was elected as the country's leader, so it seems very relevant that Obama's performance is measured in terms of how it effects America.
Say, for example, you own a one of a kind Rolls Royce automobile and it is your prize possession - for which you sacrificed for decades working in order to afford. This car is in perfect mint condition with it's original pearl white paint job. Suppose you hire a driver for this car and on his first day on the job, after dropping you off at an appointment, the driver goes and gets the car painted black - his favorite color. If we just consider the driver in a vacuum, then there isn't much to blame. A driver's favorite color is black and he gets the car he's driving painted black. Obama supporters are looking at you, the irate owner of the car, wondering why the hell you have a problem with the color black - accusing you of of having some sort of problem with the color even. What's being discounted is the car - the focus is on the driver and not the car - which is the whole reason why the driver was hired in the first place - the whole reason that he's even a driver.
We hired Obama to drive and take care of a country with a culture, philosophy, and ideals already colored in. It's not really about what colors Obama is painting - it's that he is painting over the prize possession that we hired him to protect. We don't elect a president to invent us some new country. If we all had just migrated to the moon and needed a country found, then we might hire or elect someone to follow his vision of the perfect country and invent one for us - create a constitution.
Since Obama was elected to be President of America - not Europe, the world, or the moon - it seems reasonable that he be judged in the context of his effect on the country, his driving.
This still leaves the question - why does America not more significantly factor into the liberal's assessment of Obama? If you don't value America then why do you care - and how relevant is your opinion on the matter? If you want America repainted, you basically want your own new country; yet, instead of building, fighting for, and inventing your own - you want to hijack America foundation and paint over qualities that many find to be her most unique and special.
Obama is the bastard driver who has his feet up on your desk while he informs you that your car's being repainted to match his own favorite color.
I think this divide can be explained by a difference in perspective. Going from left to right, what sort of perspective could explain the positive opinions that many on the left seem to have towards Obama. I can only see Obama as a good thing if I think about him and his actions as being in a vacuum and take America out of the scenario. Now I can look at spending money on social reforms as a pretty humanitarian act. Likewise, reforming health care so that everybody can have it, sounds pretty compassionate too. Even the way that Obama bows to foreign leaders almost seems to have a bit of charm in it's humility. This perspective requires that the focus be limited to Obama.
Obama critics are not judging Obama in a vacuum. They are viewing Obama in the context of America. He was elected as the country's leader, so it seems very relevant that Obama's performance is measured in terms of how it effects America.
Say, for example, you own a one of a kind Rolls Royce automobile and it is your prize possession - for which you sacrificed for decades working in order to afford. This car is in perfect mint condition with it's original pearl white paint job. Suppose you hire a driver for this car and on his first day on the job, after dropping you off at an appointment, the driver goes and gets the car painted black - his favorite color. If we just consider the driver in a vacuum, then there isn't much to blame. A driver's favorite color is black and he gets the car he's driving painted black. Obama supporters are looking at you, the irate owner of the car, wondering why the hell you have a problem with the color black - accusing you of of having some sort of problem with the color even. What's being discounted is the car - the focus is on the driver and not the car - which is the whole reason why the driver was hired in the first place - the whole reason that he's even a driver.
We hired Obama to drive and take care of a country with a culture, philosophy, and ideals already colored in. It's not really about what colors Obama is painting - it's that he is painting over the prize possession that we hired him to protect. We don't elect a president to invent us some new country. If we all had just migrated to the moon and needed a country found, then we might hire or elect someone to follow his vision of the perfect country and invent one for us - create a constitution.
Since Obama was elected to be President of America - not Europe, the world, or the moon - it seems reasonable that he be judged in the context of his effect on the country, his driving.
This still leaves the question - why does America not more significantly factor into the liberal's assessment of Obama? If you don't value America then why do you care - and how relevant is your opinion on the matter? If you want America repainted, you basically want your own new country; yet, instead of building, fighting for, and inventing your own - you want to hijack America foundation and paint over qualities that many find to be her most unique and special.
Obama is the bastard driver who has his feet up on your desk while he informs you that your car's being repainted to match his own favorite color.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Removal from office is no longer enough.
Impeachment is no longer enough. Voting congress out of office is no longer enough. I want President Obama and the Democrats in congress charged and put on trial: on trial in front of the American people to answer for their law breaking and deliberate destruction of America's economy and security. No I will not list the specific crimes nor attempt to convince. If you don't understand. If you don't see. If you need convincing, beyond what you've witnessed from these criminals, then you are one of them; then you should probably be on trial too.
If it takes 50 years, I want these traitors to face trial and punishment. I want you fellow Americans to never forget what they have done; let's be sure to write about it, archive all of the deeds and lies, pass on to our children and grandchildren to pass on through America's future generations: that Barack Hussein Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Richard Dick Durbin, Claire McCaskill, Carl Levin, swift-boat John Kerry, Klansman Robert Byrd, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and the rest, sought to destroy America and betray the American people. I want my great great grandchildren to know that Obama's great great grandchildren's great great grandfather, was the worst President and criminal in history. I want Harry Reid's name to forever be synonymous with treachery.
Whatever it takes, these criminal traitors must be brought to fair public trial and then executed once they are found guilty. I believe treason is still punishable by death.
No, impeachment is no longer a just recourse.
If it takes 50 years, I want these traitors to face trial and punishment. I want you fellow Americans to never forget what they have done; let's be sure to write about it, archive all of the deeds and lies, pass on to our children and grandchildren to pass on through America's future generations: that Barack Hussein Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Richard Dick Durbin, Claire McCaskill, Carl Levin, swift-boat John Kerry, Klansman Robert Byrd, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and the rest, sought to destroy America and betray the American people. I want my great great grandchildren to know that Obama's great great grandchildren's great great grandfather, was the worst President and criminal in history. I want Harry Reid's name to forever be synonymous with treachery.
Whatever it takes, these criminal traitors must be brought to fair public trial and then executed once they are found guilty. I believe treason is still punishable by death.
No, impeachment is no longer a just recourse.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Questions Before Answers
I just have a few questions that I have to get out. Maybe you have some answers for them?
Why did Obama and Eric Holder decide to have the 911 trial in civil court?
Why did the secretary of defense Gates say "I'm not even going to go there," and also "I'm the last person that should be going down that road," when he was asked if Islam could have played any part in the Fort Hood Muslim terrorist attack?
Why has Obama not yet allowed the security council access to the Fort Hood report that was completed and submitted to the president weeks ago?
Why is health reform so urgent and why are the Democrats so drastically eager to get a bill passed?
Why are Navy Seals and other American soldiers being prosecuted for things as minor as allegedly slapping an evil murderous terrorist in the face?
Why did Obama go to the global warming (one world government) conference? In fact, why in the hell would he even consider the treaty being discussed at the conference: signing a treaty that gives up any of the State's own governing power; agreeing to billions of dollars in environmental retribution to other countries when America is undergoing an extreme financial crisis? Are you fucking kidding me?
Why would any President send troops into battle under rules of engagement that diminish their strength, safety and advantage over the enemy? Rules of engagement that already have gotten a score of soldiers killed? Why in the hell would any President do that?
Why are heads not rolling over the fort Hood terrorist attack and security breach? Nobody? Someone should have lost their god damn job for being so overly politically correct that many US citizens, soldiers even, on US soil even, on the grounds of our God Damn largest military base even? Navy Seals are being prosecuted for being a little rough (supposedly) with terrorist during capture, but not even an intern was fired over the Fort Hood massacre? Secretary Gates, you "can't go there" after 13 of your soldiers are shot and killed on one of your homeland bases? If you can't go there sir, you should go the hell home.
Why did Obama and Eric Holder decide to have the 911 trial in civil court?
Why did the secretary of defense Gates say "I'm not even going to go there," and also "I'm the last person that should be going down that road," when he was asked if Islam could have played any part in the Fort Hood Muslim terrorist attack?
Why has Obama not yet allowed the security council access to the Fort Hood report that was completed and submitted to the president weeks ago?
Why is health reform so urgent and why are the Democrats so drastically eager to get a bill passed?
Why are Navy Seals and other American soldiers being prosecuted for things as minor as allegedly slapping an evil murderous terrorist in the face?
Why did Obama go to the global warming (one world government) conference? In fact, why in the hell would he even consider the treaty being discussed at the conference: signing a treaty that gives up any of the State's own governing power; agreeing to billions of dollars in environmental retribution to other countries when America is undergoing an extreme financial crisis? Are you fucking kidding me?
Why would any President send troops into battle under rules of engagement that diminish their strength, safety and advantage over the enemy? Rules of engagement that already have gotten a score of soldiers killed? Why in the hell would any President do that?
Why are heads not rolling over the fort Hood terrorist attack and security breach? Nobody? Someone should have lost their god damn job for being so overly politically correct that many US citizens, soldiers even, on US soil even, on the grounds of our God Damn largest military base even? Navy Seals are being prosecuted for being a little rough (supposedly) with terrorist during capture, but not even an intern was fired over the Fort Hood massacre? Secretary Gates, you "can't go there" after 13 of your soldiers are shot and killed on one of your homeland bases? If you can't go there sir, you should go the hell home.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)