Here is some truth about diversity and tolerance for you.

So this jackass, Coumo,  can take his tolerance and diversity and shove both concepts up his traitorous ass. What ever happened to unity? To American uniting. To one nation? Where did the neighbor, the co-patriot, the brother in arms, the we that once stood united? When someone is being "tolerated," it's a good bet that another is being imposed upon. Any idiot should get that. This diversity and tolerance, is no more than a total scam by those wanting to control the direction of tolerance - to demand diversity where they need it .  unwrapped, these two notions - deceptions, are nothing other than social engineering techniques: tools the left is using to manipulate and redistribute power. This is what is actually going on. Diversity? This is complete smoke. If you peal away the political correct bullshit - to where you realize that diversity is a bullshit ideal and hardly significant enough to drive major policies and legislation. You take away all that smoke, and it is crystal clear and obvious, that a lot of legislation and policy being enacted, is out right power and control efforts that haven't a single shred of moral purpose to them. Believe it or not, this isn't the sickest, scariest part of the whole bamboozle: Yes, it is disturbing that the left has already pulled it off, and has been very effectively using these diversity tools for a while now. Pretty dishonest. But, worse, look at how they choose to use these powerful methods - look at where they've aimed these weapons. Have they come to you with opportunities because your diversity is "important" and "essential?" Have they made people tread less on you  - tolerate you more - because tolerance is so "necessary?" Has Janet tried to talk you into moving up the ranks of homeland security, because it is one of her main action items this year, to increase the "diversity" throughout the higher ranks of the department? How much money did Obama allocate for you to attend Harvard - with approved admission even  - only because it is critical to diversity, that your diversity be afforded special mobility - necessary, so you can go represent - where your diverseness is critically needed. If not this opportunity, then maybe you got the invitation to join the circle of top US entrepreneurs, so they can set you up and teach you all you need to know  in that field  - - important indeed, because much needed diversity will be brought in to an area where it i critically needed. ?

If you are like me, none of these great options came to you. And, this massive relief effort to balance out the world's diversity and tolerance levels, some how never seems in need of your unique qualities, in any ways that benefit you - in any places that would move you higher. So, the most disturbing part of this whole, sick, leftist carp - is the odd and treasonous ways they have opted to distribute the power. You aren't invited to Harvard, because it is just hundreds of Muslims from the middle east that have the needed, o-negative, type of diverseness needed there. The not-even-American type no less. Oh, and that same type is also what is needed for that entrepreneur stuff too. And, yea, same with the promotions, pay raises, appointments, positions. - all that fortunate, empowering, good stuff?  It's critical that we redistribute non-citizens, enemies, or at least home grown terrorists, and stuff  like that. We already have plenty of legal Americans, and patriots, and Christians, and Jews, and white people, and self employed people types, everywhere you go. The left is trying to redistribute the power to all the wrong people in the most wrong ways.  This is scary and sick. Why are we sending non-citizens to Harvard right now when 1/2 of us don't have a fucking job? Why are we bringing diversity to ground zero with this huge mosque - and appointing Muslims to high positions in the government - right now? right while we are fighting a war against a lot of the Muslims? While our economy is shit and we;re losing homes and going broke - why can't we get a bit of that tolerance and disbursement of opportunity? Why does our Democrat government give priority to enemies and/or non-citizens and/or the least tolerant? Why is our government turning on states and siding with foreign powers to fight them?

Okay, now I have to got write this asshole coumo a letter to make sure he knows how disgusting it is that he supports this terrible, evil, Mosque idea.

This is to you Americans not yet standing: are you in a coma? or, are you all just absolute idiots?

It makes me shake my head, man.

What the fuck is it with everybody?

What is it that you don’t understand about our federal government teaming up with a foreign country, against a US state, that has done nothing more than make a minor attempt to cover for gross neglect of federal responsibility, for the sake of  law and order and its very survival?  Arizona’s attempt to do something, anything, about the lack of border protection, is about as small of measure as could be. No state troops have been put into action. No law has been added that wasn’t already in place under federal law. Yet, by this mere non-provocative, whispered call by a state for "help," is enough for the current President and federal government, to nationally propagandize against a state, go after the state through law suits, and team up with the Mexican government in condemning Arizona, and in conducting a world-wide misinformation campaign against the state. Our President going against a state? For doing nothing other than restating federal law. For legislation, that in reality, does nothing other than send a rather mild reminder to the federal government, that it is their duty to handle border protection and to send a distress signal in hopes of getting help. Instead of help, Arizona gets smeared, attacked, boycotted and betrayed.

What is it about this whole situation that you aren’t understanding? why are you all, in good conscience, not giving a shit about this? At least I’m posting and bitching a lot about it. What’s wrong with you? This is clearly as day, a no brainier, massive abuse of government office, and an absurdly antagonistic approach to policy. No, actually, it’s down right fucked up governance. it is beyond incompetent. It’s craziness. It’s leadership on Caligula type levels. It frustrates me to have to even explain this. Why is this not obvious to every one of you that isn’t a total moron or automaton? What is wrong with you? Why are you all completely fucking silent? Are you waiting for fucking genocide or civil war before bothering to show the lightest recognition of wrong doing and insane governance? It pisses me off. Why don’t you do something or say something? Why don’t you post or bitch or in any slight way whatsoever, show a sign that you give a shit about anything, that you have any awareness whatsoever, of how fucked up, insane, and corrupt the current government is? How fucked up Obama is?

I’m pissed off and offended. I’m ashamed in what appears to be a populous of complete, care-nothing, do-nothing, absolute fucking retards. Say something for fuck’s sake. Don’t give me any stupid political arguments. That I even have to explain or point out that there is something terribly not right about Obama and the actions of his regime, is ridiculous. It is proof that you all must be abject, blind, fucking retards.

What’s next? Should Obama bring in some Mexican troops to help control the situation and make sure that Arizona law enforcement doesn’t get to over-zealous with requests for proof of citizenship? Or, perhaps Obama should assign some US Navy Seals, Rangers, and maybe some CIA agents, to join drug smuggling convoys and midnight hoards of illegally crossing aliens, in order to facilitate unencumbered border crossing, and offer protection against any Arizona law enforcement attempts to request identification?

Are you fucking stupid, or what’s your problem? I am offended and ashamed, that all of you fellow Americans are either too traitorous to give a damn, or too God Damn stupid to recognize any sort of problem.

Idiots.

Advice for the stupid leaders and Ballerina Brigades

Since the US government is so inept and stupid. Because the defense department are such idiots and cowards. Because our military commanders are such fags, girls and ass kissers, I will give them some simple advice on how to protect against terror, how to win a war and how to prevent tons of soldiers from taking their own lives.

1. Most problems that the Military and government have are easy to fix. Most can be fixed by taking current practices and reverse them - doing things opposite of how they are being done now. FIRE PEOPLE IN CHARGE WHEN THEY FUCK UP AND THE "SYSTEM FAILS." and "DON'T COURT MARTIAL YOUR OWN GOD DAMN SOLDIERS FOR DOING THEIR JOB."

2. Don't be a liar and coward. If you take on a fight, then fight. This means to burn your fucking rules of engagement and let soldiers kill in the most devasting and effective way possible. If a commandor or general wants to be a politician or a pussy then let him go run for congress or become a hair stylist. Don't promote pussy, political pencil pushing slip-dick cowards and ass kissers into command positions. Hello - it's an army you dip shits. If you are not comfy dealing with military stuff - which involves killing - then go work in some public relations department. This instead of trying to make the military a god damn ballerina squad because you are a pussy and ass kiss and coward and are uncomfortable with the nature of the military. Let the soldiers do their work to their full ability. This way, they will succeed and feel proud .. and the country will be safe.

3. It is incredible how stupid the current leaders of our country and military are. Any that insist to being non-stupid, are then claiming to be enemies of America. Because nobody other than an enemy would invoke such policies, govern and command in such a way, if they had 1/2 a brain and any desire to do good for the country.

Have a peek at this Obama todo List

Click image to read Obama's to do list

A few days before the trojan horse and still nobody gets it

I've been posting for about a year now about what the Health Care Bill is really about. Amnesty. Amnesty, what else could it be? We know Pelosi and Obama couldn't care less if you and I drop dead or get good health care. Also, the Democrats have hardly mentioned amnesty since Obama took office. Why in the world would one of their biggest issues just vanish? Is it logical that the Democrats would be so much more, extremely, passionate about health care reform than about amnesty? They wouldn't be. I don't know exactly how they have rigged it legally, but I strongly suspect their health care is all and only about amnesty. This is the only answer that can explain the behavior we see. The forging ahead at all cost, the frantic grab at an issue we know they couldn't care THAT desperately about... seeming to risk their political futures.... it's Amnesty - it has to be.

Obama's Inheritence from Bush Has Been Spent So Please Stop Your Withdrawals.

To those of us who work, (actually work - as apposed to gov. job), know when it was good and when it went bad. The company I was with when Obama took office, had just had a record year whith more than doubling the previous year's profit. We were expanding, hiring, planning, upgrading and growing.

By the time Obama had served 6 months as president, my company had let go 1/2 of it's 500 employees. My position was one of the casualties of a steep decline of business that coincided with Obama's inauguration almost to the week.

This company was America. Privately owned and growing, we manufactured stuff and provided services,  We were the source of income for 500 Americans  and actively hiring.

This explains why I am so offended by liberals who continue to  assert and support the notion that today's problems are inherited from Bush: first of all, it is dishonest to blame the worsening economy on Bush - and every person involved in real, private, American business knows it. Secondly, this dishonesty is providing an ongoing excuse for the current idiot-in-chief  to use as an alternative to fixing the problems - removes the necessity for Obama to do better.

The brass tax of it all is this: Democrats are so selfish and disgusting, that even during crisis when the Country doesn't need any bullshit, the Democrats protect their win and their point at the expense of the country's well being. These scoundrel Democrats would sooner lose their country than lose an argument

So to you Democrats, I say: Obama has already, for the time being at least, wrecked business for Americans. We know this, so don't waste your lies and excuses for Obama on us. Honor and good character would suggest that you democrats get honest and face reality - - be mature adults and deal with the fact that Obama is not what your hearts wanted him to be; and, no amount of fantasy is going to morph such an abysmal, feckless president into any sort of solution creator or catalyst of hope. If you democrats joined the side of truth, at least the pressure and responsibility would shift to where it belongs and can do the most good: if Obama was to ever resurrect any hope, it would only happen after the excuses stopped and he was held accountable for his performance. Unfortunately, honor and good character aren't very useful to the Democrat, so I am certain their lies will continue to provide a road of excuses for Obama as he drives America into the ground.

Why such a division of opinion about Obama: here's the answer

I find it curious how one group of Americans have a positive view of President Obama while another regards him to be a horrible president and bad for the country. What could possibly explain how presumably decent and rational people can have such a different perspective?

I think this divide can be explained by a difference in perspective. Going from left to right, what sort of perspective could explain the positive opinions that many on the left seem to have towards Obama. I can only see Obama as a good thing if I think about him and his actions as being in a vacuum and take America out of the scenario. Now I can look at spending money on social reforms as a pretty humanitarian act. Likewise, reforming health care so that everybody can have it, sounds pretty compassionate too. Even the way that Obama bows to foreign leaders almost seems to have a bit of charm in it's humility. This perspective requires that the focus be limited to Obama.

Obama critics are not judging Obama in a vacuum. They are viewing Obama in the context of America. He was elected as the country's leader, so it seems very relevant that Obama's performance is measured in terms of how it effects America.

Say, for example, you own a one of a kind Rolls Royce automobile and it is your prize possession - for which you sacrificed for decades working in order to afford. This car is in perfect mint condition with it's original pearl white paint job. Suppose you hire a driver for this car and on his first day on the job, after dropping you off at an appointment, the driver goes and gets the car painted black - his favorite color. If we just consider the driver in a vacuum, then there isn't much to blame. A driver's favorite color is black and he gets the car he's driving painted black. Obama supporters are looking at you, the irate owner of the car, wondering why the hell you have a problem with the color black - accusing you of of having some sort of problem with the color even. What's being discounted is the car - the focus is on the driver and not the car - which is the whole reason why the driver was hired in the first place - the whole reason that he's even a driver.

We hired Obama to drive and take care of a country with a culture, philosophy, and ideals already colored in. It's not really about what colors Obama is painting - it's that he is painting over the prize possession that we hired him to protect. We don't elect a president to invent us some new country. If we all had just migrated to the moon and needed a country found, then we might hire or elect someone to follow his vision of the perfect country and invent one for us - create a constitution.

Since Obama was elected to be President of America - not Europe, the world, or the moon - it seems reasonable that he be judged in the context of his effect on the country, his driving.

This still leaves the question - why does America not more significantly factor into the liberal's assessment of Obama? If you don't value America then why do you care - and how relevant is your opinion on the matter? If you want America repainted, you basically want your own new country; yet, instead of building, fighting for, and inventing your own - you want to hijack America foundation and paint over qualities that many find to be her most unique and special.

Obama is the bastard driver who has his feet up on your desk while he informs you that your car's being repainted to match his own favorite color.