Seriously, most of us are rational people; those of us that are, for the moment, victims of insidious marketing and manipulation, need only to take a quick, sober look at the types of people behind the significant parts of the "liberal" machine. Media Matters. MSNBC. Globalism. "Sustainability." One World. Obama. George Soros. Inclusion. Multiculturalism. Affirmative action. United Nations. Carbon credits and taxes. These angles of persuasion networked throughout the liberal agenda, are as infectious as they are deceptive.
The leaders at the head of this liberal beast, along with legions of conned, educated, intelligent professionals, devote careers and lifetimes, thinking about and developing strategies relating to social persuasion and manipulation. Those of us with more private and less aggrandized agendas, are at a distinct disadvantage, in that our work mainly relates to supporting our family and to producing things. Contrastingly, the standard career paths taken by those swept into the left wing's deceptions, relate mostly to different forms of gaming the systems, and political wrangling. 'Lawyers." "organizers." "reporters." "Politicians." "Unions." "Political action committees." "Campaigns." "media." "entertainment." Most all the common endeavors of the left, share a related theme and purpose; they all are forms of, and skills lending to, the "influencing" of other people and key parts of the system; some of us find meaning in the genres of endeavor that service and produce; prey to the others, who focus on how to influence and take.
Of course many of us get snared within the left agenda when there are massive legions of professionals specializing in forms of persuasion and the manipulation of perception.
But here's how you can sharply break free; first, contemplate for a moment, how disgusting and strange it is, the devoting one's talent and life, to manipulating people's opinions and perceptions? These people have committees, companies, specialties, departments, organizations - devoted to things as small as developing terminology that will most effectively manipulate public perception, to favor whatever tactic the left wing agenda is taking.
After you think on that, have a look at how down right idiotic, albeit freaking scary, the things are that the left leaders are saying and doing. Look up "Agenda 21" - here's some text below. When one reads this insanity, it is clear that a great amount of energy was put into its formulation. It is also clear, that it says nothing and is a complete bunch of ambiguous bullshit and nonsense.
Essentially it is the same plan and attempt, the only plan, the left ever has - it just just gets re-packaged into new tactics, over and over again. Basically, this Agenda 21 effort is just more maneuvering for control by the control freak left, nothing new: the world and the little people in it, need to be organized into a tighter collective; and you'll notice this Angenda21 statement doesn't recommend any specific or concrete laws or arrangements, what they really want - what they are really proposing, is that everybody behave collectively - and comply with whatever cultural preference or idea the enlightened of the left might have; (to be defined and redefined by them later) - - not important... for now what's important is that we all be gathered up, and strings be put upon everyone's behavior; It isn't about an idea or an attempt to do the right thing; this bullshit is only about controlling everyone's behavior. If it was about anything more, these "agendas" would prescribe or propose something specific. Agenda 21 is nothing new, nor specific. Just another attempt, to design better processes for herding and orchestrating the public; for controlling behavior.
Now read this example of leftist thinking, and of the liberal's pathological pursuit of control. If you are in any way a normal, sane, and/or reasonable human being, you will be sick to your stomach from reading this crap. You will break free of the propaganda, and free from the leftist psycho-hive mind control that, just for a time I hope, you've likely been swept into.
Agenda 21 for culture
United Cities and Local Governments
- Committee on culture
UNITED CITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
-COMMITTEE ON CULTURE
Agenda 21 for culture
The Agenda 21 for culture is the first document with worldwide mission that advocates establishing the groundwork of an undertaking by cities and local governments for cultural development.
The Agenda 21 for culture was agreed by cities and local governments from all over the world to
enshrine their commitment to human rights, cultural diversity, sustainability, participatory democracy
and creating conditions for peace. It was approved by the 4th Forum of Local Authorities for Social Inclusion
of Porto Alegre, held in Barcelona on 8 May 2004 as part of the first Universal Forum of Cultures.
United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) adopted the Agenda 21 for culture as a reference document for its programmes on culture and assumed the role of coordinator of the process subsequent to its
approval. UCLG’s Committee on Culture is the meeting point for cities, local governments and networks that place culture at the heart of their development processes.
A growing number of cities and local governments the world over have adhered to the Agenda 21 for
culture in their local councils. The process has raised the interest of international organisations, national governments and civil society.
How to adopt Agenda 21 for culture in your municipality
Around 300 cities, local governments and organisations from all over the world are linked to Agenda
21 for culture. A complete list is periodically updated on the website.
The formal adoption of Agenda 21 for culture by a local government is of major importance: it expresses the undertaking with the citizens so as to ensure that culture takes a key role in urban policies, and it shows a sign of solidarity and cooperation with the cities and local governments of the world.
A standard form for adoption of Agenda 21 for culture is found on the website. In order to ensure that
adoptions are kept up-to-date, cities and local governments are kindly requested to send a copy of the
resolution adopted in a plenary council meeting to:
- The World Secretariat of United Cities and Local Governments:
info@cities-localgovernments.org
- The Secretariat of the Committee on culture:
agenda21cultura@bcn.cat
Furthermore, it is advisable to send a copy of the resolution to:
- The Secretary General of the Association of Cities or Municipalities of your country
- The Ministry for Culture of your country
How to implement Agenda 21 for culture in your municipality
Agenda 21 for culture provides an opportunity for every city to create a long-term vision of culture as
a basic pillar in its development. The document “Advice on local implementation of Agenda 21 for culture”
draws up general concepts and considerations, and suggests four specific tools:
- Local cultural strategy
- Charter of cultural rights and responsibilities
- Culture council
- Cultural impact assessment
You can download the full document “Advice on local implementation of Agenda 21 for culture” from
the website.
How to join UCLG’s Committee on Culture
Registration to UCLG’s Committee on Culture is possible through the form you may obtain from
info@cities-localgovernments.org
4. The contents of Agenda 21 for culture
The Agenda 21 for culture has 67 articles, divided into three large sections.
The “principles” section (16 articles) describes the relationship between culture and human rights,
diversity, sustainability, participatory democracy and peace. The “undertakings” (29 articles) concentrates
on the scope of local government responsibilities, and gives a detailed description of the request for
centrality of cultural policies. The section on “recommendations” (22 articles) advocates for the renewed
importance of culture, and demands that this importance be recognised in the programmes, budgets
and organisational charts of the various levels of government (local, national / State) and by international
organisations.
The contents of Agenda 21 for culture can also be summarised thematically.
Culture and human rights
- Culture and human development. Cultural diversity as “a means to achieve a more satisfactory
intellectual, emotional, moral and spiritual existence.”
- Cultural rights are an integral part of human rights. “No one may invoke cultural diversity to infringe
upon the human rights guaranteed by international law, nor to limit their scope.”
- Mechanisms, instruments and resources for guaranteeing freedom of speech
- Invitation to artists to commit themselves with the city, improving coexistence and quality of life, increasing
the creative and critical capacity of all citizens
Culture and governance
- New central role of culture in society. Legitimacy of cultural policies
- Quality of local development depends on the interweaving of cultural policies and other public
policies
- Local governance: a joint responsibility of citizens, civil society and governments
- Improvement of assessment mechanisms in culture. System of cultural indicators
- Importance of networks and international cooperation
- Participation of local governments in national cultural policies and programmes
Culture, sustainability and territory
- Cultural diversity, as necessary for humankind as biodiversity is for nature
- Diversity of cultural expressions brings wealth. Importance of a wide cultural ecosystem, with diversity
of origins, actors and content
- Dialogue, coexistence and interculturality as basic principles for the dynamics of citizen relationships
- Public spaces as cultural spaces
5. Culture and social inclusion
- Access to culture at all stages of life
- Expressiveness as a basic dimension of human dignity and social inclusion without any prejudice
to gender, origin, poverty or any other kind of discrimination
- Building audiences and encouraging cultural participation as vital elements of citizenship
Culture and economy
- Recognition of the economic dimension of culture. Importance of culture as a factor in the creation
of wealth and economic development
- Funding culture with various sources, such as subsidies, venture capital funds, micro-credits or tax
incentives.
- Strategic role of the cultural industries and the local media for their contribution to local identity,
creative continuity and job creation
- Relations between cultural facilities and the organisations of the knowledge economy
- Respect and guarantee rights of authors and artists and ensure their fair remuneration
The website http://www.agenda21culture.net hosts all the resources, including translations of the
document into several languages, articles, publications, news and events.
6. AGENDA 21 FOR CULTURE
An undertaking by cities and local governments
for cultural development
We, cities and local governments of the world, committed to human rights, cultural diversity, sustainability,
participatory democracy and the creation of the conditions for peace, assembled in Barcelona on 7 and
8 May 2004, at the IV Porto Alegre Forum of Local Authorities for Social Inclusion, in the framework of
the Universal Forum of Cultures – Barcelona 2004, agree on this Agenda 21 for Culture as a guiding
document for our public cultural policies and as a contribution to the cultural development of humanity.
I. Principles
1. Cultural diversity is the main heritage of humanity. It is the product of thousands of years of history,
the fruit of the collective contribution of all peoples through their languages, imaginations, technologies,
practices and creations. Culture takes on different forms, responding to dynamic models of
relationship between societies and territories. Cultural diversity is “a means to achieve a more
satisfactory intellectual, emotional, moral and spiritual existence” (UNESCO Universal Declaration
on Cultural Diversity, article 3), and is one of the essential elements in the transformation of urban
and social reality.
2. Clear political analogies exist between cultural and ecological questions, as both culture and the
environment are common assets of all humanity. The current economic development models,
which prey excessively on natural resources and common goods of humanity, are the cause of
increasing concern for the environment. Rio de Janeiro 1992, Aalborg 1994, and Johannesburg 2002,
have been the milestones in a process of answering one of the most important challenges facing
humanity: environmental sustainability. The current situation also provides sufficient evidence that
cultural diversity in the world is in danger due to a globalization that standardizes and excludes.
UNESCO says: “A source of exchange, innovation and creativity, cultural diversity is as necessary
for humankind as biodiversity is for nature” (UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity,
article 1).
3. Local governments recognize that cultural rights are an integral part of human rights, taking as their
reference the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) and the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (2001). They recognize that the cultural freedom of individuals and communities is an essential condition for democracy. No one may invoke cultural diversity to infringe upon the human rights guaranteed by international law, nor to limit their scope.
4. Local governments are worldwide agents of prime importance as defenders and promoters of the
advance of human rights. They also represent the citizens of the world and speak out in favour of
international democratic systems and institutions. Local governments work together in networks,
exchanging practices and experiences and coordinating their actions.
5. Cultural development relies on a host of social agents. The main principles of good governance include transparency of information and public participation in the conception of cultural policies, decisionmaking processes and the assessment of programmes and projects.
6. The indispensable need to create the conditions for peace must go hand in hand with cultural
development strategies. War, terrorism, oppression and discrimination are expressions of intolerance
which must be condemned and eradicated.
7. Cities and local spaces are a privileged setting for cultural invention which is in constant evolution,
and provide the environment for creative diversity, where encounters amongst everything that is
different and distinct (origins, visions, ages, genders, ethnic groups and social classes) are what makes
full human development possible. Dialogue between identity and diversity, individual and group,
is a vital tool for guaranteeing both a planetary cultural citizenship as well as the survival of linguistic
diversity and the development of cultures.
8. Coexistence in cities is a joint responsibility of citizens, civil society and local governments. Laws
are fundamental, but cannot be the only way of regulating coexistence in cities. As the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (article 29) states: “Everyone has duties to the community in which
alone the free and full development of his …(/her)… personality is possible”.
9. Cultural heritage, tangible and intangible, testifies to human creativity and forms the bedrock
underlying the identity of peoples. Cultural life contains both the wealth of being able to appreciate
and treasure traditions of all peoples and an opportunity to enable the creation and innovation of
endogenous cultural forms. These qualities preclude any imposition of rigid cultural models.
10. The affirmation of cultures, and the policies which support their recognition and viability, are an essential factor in the sustainable development of cities and territories and its human, economic, political and social dimension. The central nature of public cultural policies is a demand of societies in the contemporary world. The quality of local development depends on the interweaving of cultural and
other public policies – social, economic, educational, environmental and urban planning.
11. Cultural policies must strike a balance between public and private interest, public functions and the
institutionalization of culture. Excessive institutionalization or the excessive prevalence of the market
as the sole distributor of cultural resources involves risks and hampers the dynamic development
of cultural systems. The autonomous initiative of the citizens, individually or in social entities and
movements, is the basis of cultural freedom.
12. Proper economic assessment of the creation and distribution of cultural goods – amateur or
professional, craft or industrial, individual or collective – becomes, in the contemporary world, a decisive
factor in emancipation, a guarantee of diversity and, therefore, an attainment of the democratic right
of peoples to affirm their identities in the relations between cultures. Cultural goods and services,
as stated in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (article 8), “as vectors of
identity, values and meaning, must not be treated as mere commodities or consumer goods”. It is
necessary to emphasize the importance of culture as a factor in the creation of wealth and economic
development.
13. Access to the cultural and symbolic universe at all stages of life, from childhood to old age, is a fundamental element in the shaping of sensitivity, expressiveness and coexistence and the construction of citizenship. The cultural identity of each individual is dynamic.
14. The appropriation of information and its transformation into knowledge by the citizens is a cultural
act. Therefore access without discrimination to expressive, technological and communication
resources and the constitution of horizontal networks strengthens and nourishes the collective
heritage of a knowledge-based society.
15. Work is one of the principal spheres of human creativity. Its cultural dimension must be recognized
and developed. The organization of work and the involvement of businesses in the city or territory
must respect this dimension as one of the basic elements in human dignity and sustainable
development.
16. Public spaces are collective goods that belong to all citizens. No individual or group can be deprived of free use of them, providing they respect the rules adopted by each city.
II. Undertakings
17. To establish policies that foster cultural diversity in order to guarantee a broad supply and to
promote the presence of all cultures especially minority or unprotected cultures, in the media and
to support co-productions and exchanges avoiding hegemonic positions.
18. To support and promote, through different means and instruments, the maintenance and expansion
of cultural goods and services, ensuring universal access to them, increasing the creative capacity
of all citizens, the wealth represented by linguistic diversity, promoting artistic quality, searching new
forms of expression and the experimentation with new art languages, as well as the reformulation
and the interaction between traditions, and the implementation of mechanisms of cultural
management which detect new cultural movements and new artistic talent and encourage them
to reach fulfillment. Local governments state their commitment to creating and increasing cultural
audiences and encouraging cultural participation as a vital element of citizenship.
19. To implement the appropriate instruments to guarantee the democratic participation of citizens in
the formulation, exercise and evaluation of public cultural policies.
20. To guarantee the public funding of culture by means of the necessary instruments. Notable among
these are the direct funding of public programmes and services, support for private enterprise
activities through subsidies, and newer models such as micro-credits, risk-capital funds, etc. It is
also possible to consider establishing legal systems to facilitate tax incentives for companies
investing in culture, providing these respect the public interest.
21. To open up spaces for dialogue between different spiritual and religious choices living side by side
in the local area, and between these groups and the public authorities to ensure the right to free
speech and harmonious coexistence.
22. To promote expression as a basic dimension of human dignity and social inclusion without prejudice by gender, age, ethnic origin, disability, poverty or any other kind of discrimination which hinders the full exercise of freedoms. The struggle against exclusion is a struggle for the dignity of all
people.
23. To promote the continuity and the development of indigenous local cultures, which are bearers of
a historic and interactive relation with the territory.
24. To guarantee the cultural expression and participation of people with cultures from immigration or
originally rooted in other areas. At the same time, local governments undertake to provide the
means for immigrants to have access to and participate in the culture of the host community. That
reciprocal commitment is the foundation of coexistence and intercultural processes, which in fact,
without that name, have contributed to creating the identity of each city.
25. To promote the implementation of forms of “cultural impact assessment” as a mandatory consideration of the public or private initiatives that involve significant changes in the cultural life of cities.
26. To consider cultural parameters in all urban and regional planning, establishing the laws, rules
and regulations required to ensure protection of local cultural heritage and the legacy of previous
generations.
27. To promote the existence of the public spaces of the city and foster their use as cultural places for
interaction and coexistence. To foster concern for the aesthetics of public spaces and collective amenities.
28. To implement measures to decentralize cultural policies and resources, legitimating the creative originality of the so-called peripheries, favoring the vulnerable sectors of society and defending the principle of the right of all citizens to culture and knowledge without discrimination. That determination does not mean avoiding central responsibilities and, in particular, responsibility for funding any decentralization project.
29. To particularly promote coordination between the cultural policies of local governments that share
a territory, creating a dialogue that values the identity of each authority, their contribution to the
whole and the efficiency of the services for citizens.
30. To boost the strategic role of the cultural industries and the local media for their contribution to
local identity, creative continuity and job creation.
31. To promote the socialization of and access to the digital dimension of projects and the local or global cultural heritage. The information and communication technologies should be used as tools for bringing cultural knowledge within the reach of all citizens.
32. To implement policies whose aim is the promote access to local public media and to develop these
media in accordance with the interests of the community, following the principles of plurality,
transparency and responsibility.
33. To generate the mechanisms, instruments and resources for guaranteeing freedom of speech.
34. To respect and guarantee the moral rights of authors and artists and ensure their fair remuneration.
35. To invite creators and artists to commit themselves to the city and the territory by identifying the
problems and conflicts of our society, improving coexistence and quality of life, increasing the
creative and critical capacity of all citizens and, especially, cooperating to contribute to the resolution
of the challenges faced by the cities.
36. To establish policies and investments to encourage reading and the diffusion of books, as well as
full access for all citizens to global and local literary production.
37. To foster the public and collective character of culture, promoting the contact of all sectors of the
city with all forms of expression that favour conviviality: live shows, films, festivals, etc.
38. To generate coordination between cultural and education policies, encouraging the promotion of
creativity and sensitivity and the relations between cultural expressions of the territory and the
education system.
39. To guarantee that people with disabilities can enjoy cultural goods and services, facilitating their access to cultural services and activities.
40. To promote relations between the cultural facilities and other entities working with knowledge, such as universities, research centers and research companies.
41. To promote programmes aimed at popularizing scientific and technical culture among all citizens,
especially taking into account that the ethical, social, economic and political issues raised by
possible applications of new scientific knowledge are of public interest.
42. To establish legal instruments and implement actions to protect the cultural heritage by means of
inventories, registers, catalogues and to promote and popularize heritage appreciation through
activities such as exhibitions, museums or itineraries.
43. To protect, valorize and popularize the local documentary heritage generated in the public
local/regional sphere, on their own initiative or in association with public and private entities,
providing incentives for the creation of municipal and regional systems for that purpose.
44. To encourage the free exploration of cultural heritage by all citizens in all parts of the world. To promote,
in relation with the professionals in the sector, forms of tourism that respect the cultures and
customs of the localities and territories visited.
45. To develop and implement policies that deepen multilateral processes based on the principle of reciprocity.
International cultural cooperation is an indispensable tool for the constitution of a supportive
human community which promotes the free circulation of artists and cultural operators, especially
across the north-south frontier, as an essential contribution to dialogue between peoples to overcome
the imbalances brought about by colonialism and for interregional integration.
III. Recommendations
TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
46. All local governments are invited to submit this document for the approval of their legislative bodies and to carry out a wider debate with local society.
47. Ensure the central place of culture in local policies and promote the drafting of an Agenda 21 for
culture in each city or territory, in close coordination with processes of public participation and strategic planning.
48. Make proposals for agreeing the mechanisms for cultural management with other institutional
levels, always respecting the principle of subsidiarity.
49. Fulfill, before 2006, a proposal for a system of cultural indicators that support the deployment of
this Agenda 21 for culture, including methods to facilitate monitoring and comparability.
TO STATE AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
50. Establish instruments for public intervention in the cultural field, bearing in mind the increase in
citizens’ cultural needs, current deficiencies of cultural programmes and resources and the
importance of devolving budgetary allocations. Moreover, it is necessary to work to allocate a
minimum of 1% of the national budget for culture.
51. Establish mechanisms for consultation and agreement with local governments, directly or through
their networks and federations, to make new legislation, rules and systems for funding in the
cultural field.
52. Avoid trade agreements that constrain the free development of culture and the exchange of cultural
goods and services on equal terms.
53. Approve legal provisions to avoid the concentration of cultural and communication industries and
to promote cooperation, particularly in the field of production, with local and regional representatives
and agents.
54. Guarantee appropriate mention of the origin of cultural goods exhibited in our territories and adopt
measures to prevent illegal trafficking of goods belonging to the historic heritage of other peoples.
55. Implement at state or national level international agreements on cultural diversity, especially the
UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, approved at the 31st General Conference, in
November 2001, and the Plan of Action on Cultural Policies for Development agreed at the
Intergovernmental Conference in Stockholm (1998).
TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
ORGANIZATIONS OF CITIES
56. To United Cities and Local Governments: adopt this Agenda 21 for Culture as a reference document for their cultural programmes and also assume their role as coordinators of the process after their adoption.
57. To continental networks of cities and local governments (especially the ones that promoted this Agenda 21 such as Interlocal, Eurocities, Sigma or Mercociudades): consider this document within their technical action and policy programmes. UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMMES AND AGENCIES
59. To UNESCO: recognize this Agenda 21 for Culture as a reference document in its work preparing
the international legal instrument or Convention on Cultural Diversity planned for 2005.
59. To UNESCO: recognize cities as the territories where the principles of cultural diversity are applied,
especially those aspects related to coexistence, democracy and participation; and to establish the
means for local governments to participate in its programmes.
60. To the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): deepen its analysis of culture and
development and incorporate cultural indicators into the calculation of the human development index
(HDI).
61. To the Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Sustainable Development Section, which is responsible for the monitoring of Agenda 21: develop the cultural dimension of sustainability following the principles and commitments of this Agenda 21 for Culture.
62. To United Nations – HABITAT: consider this document as a basis for the establishing the importance of the cultural dimension of urban policies.
63. To the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: include the urban
dimension in its analysis of the relations between cultural rights and other human rights.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND SUPRANATIONAL ORGANISATIONS
64. To the World Trade Organizations: exclude cultural goods and services from their negotiation rounds. The bases for exchanges of cultural goods and services must be established in a new international legal instrument such as the Convention on Cultural Diversity planned for 2005.
65. To the continental organizations (European Union, Mercosur, African Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations): incorporate culture as a pillar of their construction. Respecting the national
competences and subsidiarity, there is a need for a continental cultural policy based on the principles
of the legitimacy of public intervention in culture, diversity, participation, democracy and networking.
66. To the multilateral bodies established on principles of cultural affinity (for example, the Council of
Europe, the League of Arab States, the Organization of Iberoamerican States, the International
Francophone Organisation, the Commonwealth, the Community of Portuguese Language Countries,
the Latin Union): promote dialogue and joint projects which lead to a greater understanding between
civilizations and the generation of mutual knowledge and trust, the basis of peace.
67. To the International Network for Cultural Policies (states and ministers of culture) and the International Network for Cultural Diversity (artists’ associations): consider the cities as fundamental territories of cultural diversity, to establish the mechanisms for the participation of local governments in their work and to include the principles set out in this Agenda 21 for culture in their plans of action.
Barcelona, 8 de mayo de 2004
Committee on culture – United Cities and Local Governments – UCLG
Commission de culture – Cités et Gouvernements Locaux Unis – CGLU
Comisión de cultura – Ciudades y Gobiernos Locales Unidos – CGLU
http://www.agenda21culture.net
http://www.cities-localgovernments.org
agenda21cultura@bcn.cat
info@cities-localgovernments.org
The Agenda 21 for culture is available in English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Bulgarian, Catalan, Galician, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese
and Turkish. Committed to cultural and linguistic diversity, the Committee on culture encourages its translation into more languages.
L'Agenda 21 de la culture est disponible en anglais, français, espagnol, allemand, arabe, bulgare, catalan, galicien, italien, japonais,
portugais et turc. Engagé à la diversité culturelle et linguistique, la Commission de culture encourage sa traduction dans d’autres langues.
La Agenda 21 de la cultura está disponible en inglés, francés, español, alemán, árabe, búlgaro, catalán, gallego, italiano, japonés, portugués
y turco. Comprometido con la diversidad cultural y lingüística, la Comisión de cultura anima a su traducción a otras lenguas.
No comments:
Post a Comment