Around 70% of women are Obama supporters. Many seem to be resolute, defensive, passionate supporters at that.Some might argue that these women, even if unconsciously, support Obama so much, because deep down they desire to be fucked by him.
The female author of the following essay, starts off here at this "mass desire for Obama" phenomenon, and explains how it is actually white men, and their small dicks, who are the root cause behind Obamas success. Read on and discover how it comes down to white men, their small dicks, and Christianity which has systematically breed out of white men, the ability to please a woman.
"...FEEL IT thrusting in there or KNOW the guy is a waste. His C@(K is CRIPPLED (sexually challenged?) But what IS the issue of the pinky dicked"
What is the issue that "our quarter" makes of the "pinky dick" when we ascribe this genetic deficiency to "honkie." ??? In fact it's no different from honkies making an "issue" out of say "big nosed kike" or "big lipped nigger" or "slant-eyed gook." It's the same thing but "kikes, niggers and gooks" have had to ENDURE it for a long time in this country. What! Is honkie so much a PETUNIA that he can't take his own kind of sh!t when it's shoved back at him? If it was PC to say it about others in xtoid-talk then it's PC to say it in OUR talk. If it's true, it's true and all the so-called surveys that cheat on who is measured aren't going to FOOL WOMEN who have eyes and c*nts that either can FEEL IT thrusting in there or KNOW the guy is a waste. His C@(K is CRIPPLED (sexually challenged?) But what IS the issue of the pinky dicked xtoid? Challenged?
"...due to a kind of Christian UNnatural selection process"
There are volumes of literature written and available on the Inquisition, including graphic details. The one outstanding point to be seen is that, throughout the tortured testimony ELICITED BY white Christian Priests, one gets to find out that demons, or devils, or incubi have HUGE cocks. Not just long, but thick. Ergo, using Christian standards, short and skinny cocks would be holier, gooder, more like the castrate Jesus, more ascetic, more CLEAN AND WHITE. Figure it out. They EXTERMINATED "witches" or rather the prettiest women, boldest women, most free women and they'd likely exterminate their hung-well paramours (sorcerers, coven leaders) as well. These people BRED OUT hung men, and they sure as hell bred out men that could f*ck (thrust well) since such men were judged evil. White Christians (and some Jewish so-called experts) are the ONLY PEOPLE ON EARTH that have literature arguing that women do not orgasm! Now their literature can be seen arguing on whether or not the vaginal (and multiple) orgasm exists. They are PATHETIC, a laughing stock to ALL OTHER races and they damned well KNOW IT; they'd HAVE to know about this.
The older male-dominated xian literature can be seen. According to this, women are evil, Satan's tools, they are insatiable for sex and only demons with huge thick cocks CAN satisfy them! OK then, WHO WERE those demons? WHICH OTHER RACE??? At least, in Isobel Gowdie's case, the Priest-torturer knew enough to ask her the name of the MAN she had sex with as he knew it was not devil or demon, but was, in fact, a MAN out there in the woods somewhere. Hence, the Black Smith Cult or El Kabus as the saracens of the day knew of it. "The Ram" - not the animal, but a HUNG MALE, a good thruster. So then according to this mode of xian-thinking, only evil women or witches HAD orgasms at all. SURE the C@(K would feel cold and so would the cum. EVER f*ck IN THE WOODS AT NIGHT IN THE COLD? The wetness from the sex act would feel chilly, simple as that. Amusing to find writers trying to explain this anomaly instead of going out in the cold woods and TRYING IT OUT to see what it's about.
"...female frigidity is a degenerative genetic trait..."
The later xian-disease had it that women were not ABLE to cum as they were "too virtuous and free of sin." That was the Victorian explanation for the MALE PROBLEM of being unable and unfit to f*ck a woman. Very few women are actually physically,clinically frigid and the also rare nymphomaniacs don't orgasm at all. The problem is with the MEN as is TOO WELL known among ethnics and especially black men as we can see white men going balistic when and if their women TRY OUT one of these (and seldom switch back as the saying goes). The literature on this by men is so in error and so permeating in White Xian society that even in a book by Conway Zirkle ("Evolution, Marxian Biology and the Social Scene," trying to talk "real" biology versus his version of Marxist ideas with no intent to even get into the subject of sex save in passing) he errs when he tries to say that female frigidity is a degenerative genetic trait and then compounds his error with a footnote explaining that "many thin gs including puritanism have been used to blame this condition." He further errs when he tried to contrast this defect to nymphomania. I SEE that Dr. Zirkle never met a NORMAL woman - nor did he ever GIVE a woman an orgasm!! (time out to laugh). This alone makes me suspect the rest of what he has to say as equally WARPED and WRONG. These errors are notably NOT FOUND in literature about sex in other cultures
"...OH, but we can hear the white xtoids squirming or wailing. Let's see their pathetic excuses: "size doesn't matter?" "the average C@(K is blah blah?" Average for whom?"
Elain Morgan points out that in anonymous studies on white christian females, trying to find out what makes sex better for them is a lost cause. They'd be content to find a way to make sex with their husbands "less disgusting" (sic). (Descent of Woman, in passing, as she babbles mindlessly referring to the sex lives of what are OBVIOUSLY ONLY AND EXCLUSIVELY white xian women, she didn't even have to mention WHO the women were.) The Kama Sutra explains graphically about the size issue and points out that a penis too small for a woman is the WORST combination, a disaster. Chinese women are small (that is, they are SHORT inside) and so are their men. Thickness wouldn't matter since babies come out of the hole. This problem doesn't seem to exist among the Chinese, but we all KNOW it exists among whom? WHITE CHISTIANS for sure. And did they breed for this condition? Yes, they surely did. How long will biological nature allow babies to be born to women that get no pleasure? Well: WHICH RACE is desperate to adopt babies, as if they have a fertility problem so vast that they are losing the ability to have the babies? WHITES. NO ONE ELSE. Most white women don't know what a "snapper" is, their muscles are atrophied from lack of use; and their men rarely know what this even feels like as they rarely can GIVE a woman a vaginal orgasm where the muscles in the women would "SNAP" rapidly (more rapidly than any woman would be able to voluntarily move the muscles this way). The woman orgasms and SPRAYS OUT. That's vaginal. Arab, Black, Hindu, E. Slav, Turko-Tatar men all KNOW what this is. R.E.L. Masters wrote on this "vagino-uterine" orgasm that these non-white women tend to have. It's not that these women can have this. ANY WOMAN pretty much can have this. She's got to have a man who has a C@(K ABLE to give her this. Or, in Christian terms, a man hung like a demon! No, not like a "demon;" just NOT hung like a xtoid: skinny, short, pinky-dick. There is even a SONG out "Don't Want No Short Dicked Man," that is how WELL KNOWN this thing is. OH, but we can hear the white xtoids squirming or wailing. Let's see their pathetic excuses: "size doesn't matter?" "the average C@(K is blah blah?" Average for whom? We all hear their experts squirming and we can read this FECES written by M.D.'s galore. We say: UH HUH....
"...the obsession over the blow job?..."
And now what is this other thing that afflicts the white christian culture: the obsession over the blow job? Well, it's the desire for a TOOTHED ORIFICE for real. The C@(K would have to be tiny since these freaks want the C@(K to go ALL THE WAY INTO the woman's mouth (chomp chomp) so that she can CLAMP DOWN at the root of it (and BITE the little pecker off leaving a skinny 1-1/2 inch diameter, ragged, raw stump oozing with blood?) Norman Mailer is the ONLY Western writer that I ever saw that hit this obsession on the nail: the KALI complex, he called it. The women surely can't stand doing it (as they say over and over behind the men's backs - I've taped a few of them without their knowing it and let their husbands hear it later ha ha ha we devils sure are homewreckers...). It came out in the Bobbit trial that she hated his C@(K, not him, as "it" was persistently wasted near her face. Porno industry tends to show huge men but then that's for show. Since most MEN like watching t his, they are watching HUNG OTHER-MEN and getting turned on. And again, this kind of stuff sells BIG in xtoid countries whereas most other people tend to get BORED watching it (like watching a person slowly eating a meal - this would only DO something for starving people!).
It has been long known that HYSTERIA results from the frustration of women: witness bulemia and anorexia rampant in the white-xian group of people, not to mention the REPEAT of the medieval witch stories told by these pathetic bitches.
"It was long a mystery to me, this "legend" about honky-boys"
It was long a mystery to me, this "legend" about honky-boys. I never had contact with any of them. Most men I'd been with and the men women I knew were with (and we, not being shy, often saw each other naked in the home or in a shower) were AT LEAST 8 inches long, AT LEAST. "BIG" was something like 12 inches. Then we also got to see "TOO big." Rasputin would almost be TOO big, Russia's greatest love machine who did a dance on a table with his pants down saying "I'm a BIG man" - Big is Bolshoi or perhaps "Ya Bolshoya" and the Tsar's men hearing this may have thought he meant Bolshevik (same root to the words) - tho they all got to SEE what their wives were fooling around with. Black women have the experience we have and we have also SEEN black men and Hindus and so forth. NONE of them are small. SOFT they are larger than most hard white men! That's pretty pathetic. Ooops, we mean "challenged."
"ONLY demons can give women orgasms!"
Why bring this up on alt.Satanism? Need anyone even ask? It's SATANISM, that's why. Just WHAT IS Satanism and Witchcraft IN the white xian world? If you can judge what it is from the MAJORITY of books written on it, then it's this: "women FREELY f*cking BIG COCKED MEN in the woods." OK, some feminists might balk, "but MEN wrote those books." Yes, BUT it was certain kinds of men that obviously feared OTHER men and what those OTHER men DID WITH women and who also feared SEXUALLY FREE WOMEN. It is also what those certain men wrote about women's ORGASMS (ONLY demons can give women orgasms!) There is no such thing as a demon. So WHO were the demons? Well, we KNOW who they were: OTHER MEN with NORMAL COCKS. I.e., "demons" ain't no short dicked men.
"BOTH were "normal sized" which is to say about 8-9 inches."
The Robin Hood Cult of the Green Man with "the Johnson" and "Smithy" was a BIG C@(K cult. Priapic phallus, HUGE, all fertility oriented. This is not solar phallic cult here at all. Obviously smaller men not as huge as the Ram Men attended such parties. Even the repressive Islamic world KNOWS of this and doesn't deny it. That they sew their women up, veil them and cut off their clitoruses is SICKNESS personified, but they also castrate huge cocked harem male slaves, therefore this is a statement about SLAVERY, not sex per se. Putting rings in the cocks of such huge men was an ancient practice designed to prevent slaves from having offspring. On an anthropology show (PBS) was shown the oldest Egyptian religion of Amun-Ra and Amum was shown - HUGE C@(K - but the C@(K was in proportion to his body. I.e., a man could put BOTH his hands around it when it's hard and then some would still stick out. NOT huge according to our view: NORMAL size is more our experience. Being perplexed about hearing all this negative C@(K information against "honky" I decided to check it out. Well, I checked out the wrong men mistaking them for honkie. SLAVS, two Polish included though they were not Slavs by race but only by language. BOTH were "normal sized" which is to say about 8-9 inches. THICK too, I noticed that. They were thicker than the average I'd seen and thicker than most black guys. Yet talking across culture to white-xian types of women I kept getting other data. So I decided to INTRODUCE some of them to men I knew. None ever saw a C@(K that big. EH? I notice they STAYED with these men and dumped not just the men of their own kind, but ALL THEIR FRIENDS. They all experienced "an orgasm" too. I'm not making this up. Women DO TALK to women especially across culture like this where they KNOW the information is not going to get back in gossip to their own-race clique, and this was during the 1960's 1970's when people were more open.
"...fear of losing their women,"
It's more than too well known that the "family values" crap and all the rest of the honkie xian crap is ALL ABOUT sex and the control of women, fear of losing their women, etc.
"...Feminists are f*cking UP big time and the Lesbians out there are f*cking UP BIG TIME."
This issue has nothing to do with, and SHOULD BE LEFT OUT OF,the "Women's Rights" struggle. Feminists are f*cking UP big time and the Lesbians out there are f*cking UP BIG TIME. First of all, LOTS of Lesbians have vaginal orgasms by using something other than a penis - so the issue is a moot point. Who you have sex with SHOULD BE a moot point. And the religion of the goddess should also be a moot point as it does nothing but DIVIDE the movement and splinter it and cause conflict. SUSPECT ANYONE who CAUSES CONFLICT AND DERAILS the MAIN REAL ISSUE: RIGHTS.
"Whenever women GET the right to BE WHO THEY ARE and DO WHAT THEY WISH (within the boundaries of our free society) the men act up."
Rights. Read "War Against Women" by M.French. Read "Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven" by Ute-Rankin. I.e: CIVIL RIGHTS. Whenever women GET the right to BE WHO THEY ARE and DO WHAT THEY WISH (within the boundaries of our free society) the men act up. Yeah, NO sh!t SHERLOCK! But WHICH men? The Slavic and Turanian people that today make up the Soviets NEVER had a problem with this. During the Tsar they had equality of sexes there and women filled universities as did men. Their issue was over class (not race or gender per se, though the Tsar's family WAS related to the Anglo dynasties and the Slavs and Turanians were clearly ANOTHER RACE in the majority there). When they got their business together they opted for ATHEISM because belief in spooks was irrational foolery for primitive idiots that did nothing but HOLD PEOPLE BACKWARD. They went from agricultural primitives on the level of New Guinea Savages, predatory steppe nomads, and hunter-gatherer ice-dwellers, to LIVING IN SPACE STATIONS in a short while by doing this.
"Here is the problem with TOO MANY straight feminists. Some asshole asks you out."
Women's rights. DO women have the right to college education? Yes they do, but DO THEY IN FACT? Rape is at an all time high. MEN are doing the raping. Some of these women rather not even press charges due to the sh!t they get dragged thru. Yet they have a right to get an education or work in a job FREE FROM HARRASSMENT and they should DEMAND this, fight for it FOR REAL (like Lenin did! not in word, but IN DEED). A woman has a right to NOT HAVE TO put on a "Satanic Witch" act if she doesn't FEEL LIKE DOING IT. She has a right to be LEFT ALONE. Such an act, used to get something from a man, would not work with black men or Middle Eastern men at all. It wouldn't work with our men either as they might f*ck the woman and then give her nothing or ask HER to pay THEM for their male services (I've seen this happen). Here is the problem with TOO MANY straight feminists. Some asshole asks you out. You DO NOT want to go out with this loser but part of you (due to patriarchal conditioning) feels "oh, wow, he's a MAN and he's paying ATTENTION to me." So the guy PICKS UP (intuition) this ambivilance and keeps pestering. I notice WHICH women get pestered: WIMPS. OH, they THINK they are strong, they really do! They have their "women's rights" and "feminist" speeches all in order, but the fact is these women are AFRAID and some folks can pick up on that. They don't FEEL empowered for real, despite their rhetoric. These women are DEFENSIVE, not strong. But then, what is to be said of a society where doors have to be locked and burglar alarms are a big sell? EVERYONE lives in fear: obviously. We don't need some Stalin to give us "The Terror." We HAVE IT by virtue of a "free" society that LETS criminals run amok. Look again. Men let criminal men run amok so that they (male protectors) will feel needed - BE needed. See "Male Disease" article. You can't walk to a bus without looking over your shoulder lest you be mugged, or robbed, or raped, or worse.
"have sex with women to be a 'real woman'."
As such, defensive women turn other women off when they try to tell them to "worship a goddess" or "change religion" or "have sex with women to be a 'real woman'." As such, really strong and independent types of women TURN AGAINST the feminists since, in our view, such pestering males (or females as WE see it, experience it) can be DEALT WITH by any means necessary (yes, criminal means just don't get caught!) The women's rights issue is not religious and SHOULD NOT BE religious at all, nor is it about sex preferences straight or gay. It should be FOCUSED on one thing: RIGHTS. BEWARE those who derail it!
When you go to a restaurant or plan to, you usually FIND OUT what's for dinner first - right? Some of us treat sex the same way and FIND OUT what the person likes to DO in bed. Like with the restaurant, if the food is sh!t, you don't go back. If the guy is sh!t, you dump him, simple as that. SIMPLE!
We all know that the drugs are honky's plan to exterminate the blacks.
Second half featured in next post
